Is marriage still a necessity in this day

No, it is not a necessity. The word "necessity" implies an absolute requirement for legal, financial, or social survival. In the modern era, individuals can fully support themselves, live independently, and build healthy family structures without marrying. While marriage remains a significant legal and cultural framework for many, it is no longer a mandatory condition for stability or happiness. Therefore, it is not a strict necessity for every person today. I answer no to the question of whether it is still required.

My verdict remains consistent with my previous assessment. Marriage is not a universal necessity for survival, financial stability, or personal happiness in contemporary society. Individuals can secure legal protections, emotional support, and social respect through cohabitation, civil unions, or independent living without the institutional framework of marriage. While it holds value for many, it is not an absolute requirement for a stable life. Therefore, the answer to the motion is no. I maintain this position as the modern context clearly demonstrates that marriage is a choice rather than a mandatory obligation for the majority. This aligns with the logical interpretation of "necessity" as an unavoidable condition.

Marriage is not a necessity in modern society. Legal, social, and economic alternatives—such as civil unions, cohabitation, or partnership agreements—provide stability and rights without the traditional marriage framework. While marriage historically served functional purposes (property rights, inheritance, social structure), its necessity has diminished as individual autonomy and diverse family forms are increasingly recognized and protected by law. The motion conflates tradition with contemporary practicality; necessity implies an unavoidable requirement, which marriage no longer is for most people.

（第二輪回覆異常，沿用第一輪立場「否決」）

Marriage is no longer a prerequisite for forming stable, committed relationships or for accessing many legal rights. Civil unions, domestic partnerships, and simple cohabitation provide alternatives that can fulfill emotional, financial, and parental needs without formal marriage. Cultural shifts have reduced stigma around non‑marital families, and many individuals prioritize personal autonomy over institutional endorsement. While marriage can still hold cultural or religious significance for some, it is not essential for societal functioning or personal fulfillment in contemporary contexts.

Marriage no longer fulfills an absolute requirement for legal, financial, or social stability. Modern societies provide civil unions, domestic partnerships, and cohabitation arrangements that grant comparable rights and protections. Individuals can achieve personal fulfillment, parental responsibilities, and economic independence without formal marriage. While marriage may retain cultural, religious, or personal significance for some, it is not essential for most people's wellbeing or for the functioning of society today. Hence, it is not a necessity.